Long-term capital allocation

Realising value. Compounding capital.

Magdalen is opportunity-led rather than allocation-led. We take a patient, long-term approach to capital allocation and go where we believe the relationship between price, value and risk is most attractive.

Inception
May 2013
Portfolio return
—
Investor return
—
IRR
Capital returned
—
of paid-in capital
Total value
—
of paid-in capital

A long-term approach to value.

Capital is allocated where we believe prospective returns are most attractive relative to price and risk. We are not constrained by asset class or market capitalisation.

Research is extensive and the hurdle for deploying capital is high. We act decisively when an opportunity warrants it; otherwise, we are comfortable doing nothing.

We regard a modest capital base as an advantage, allowing us to pursue smaller opportunities and return capital when attractive opportunities are unavailable, rather than grow assets for their own sake.

The objective is not activity. It is long-term compounding.

A disciplined approach to capital.

Value

We invest where we believe the prospective return justifies the price paid and the risks accepted.

Resilience

We prefer situations where the underlying economics can withstand uncertainty and adverse conditions.

Patience

We are willing to wait for opportunities and give successful investments time to develop.

Conviction

When the investment case is compelling, we are prepared to allocate capital meaningfully.

Long-term record.

1 year —
3 years — p.a.
10 years — p.a.
Since inception — p.a.
Unit value —
— 1M — 1Y —
Period
Scale
All history · Log scale

Private company valuation: Current private company investments are ordinarily valued at 4.5x trailing twelve-month PBT. Where a holding is held for sale and an active sale process is underway, valuation is based on expected net realisable value.

A consistent philosophy across changing opportunities.

Since 2013, Magdalen has allocated capital across listed securities, private investments and direct opportunities. The mix has changed; the objective has not: realise value where appropriate and compound capital over the long term. Scale is not an objective in itself; we would rather return capital than retain it where prospective returns do not justify deployment.

We distinguish between risks to capital and risks to long-term returns.

Principal risks are assessed by likelihood and potential impact. Our primary concern is permanent capital loss; we also recognise that periods of limited opportunity may constrain returns.

Impact
HighMediumLow
01
02
03
04
05
LowMediumHigh
Likelihood
01
Major holding impairment

A significant holding suffers a permanent deterioration in its economics or value, resulting in a material loss of capital.

LikelihoodMedium ImpactHigh
02
Private valuation shortfall

A private investment ultimately realises below its carrying value, resulting in a permanent loss of capital.

LikelihoodLow-Medium ImpactHigh
03
Liquidity and realisation

Capital cannot be realised at an attractive value or within the desired timeframe.

LikelihoodMedium ImpactMedium
04
Opportunity scarcity

Attractive opportunities may be unavailable for extended periods, leaving more capital undeployed and reducing prospective returns.

LikelihoodMedium-High ImpactMedium
05
Key-person dependency

Dependence on a key decision-maker creates continuity risk if that person becomes unavailable or materially less involved.

LikelihoodLow ImpactHigh
Portfolio leverage None